THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF LATEST CASE LAWS ON CRPC

The Basic Principles Of latest case laws on crpc

The Basic Principles Of latest case laws on crpc

Blog Article

In the event the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only performed In the event the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded on the allegations as a result they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to get seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions

fourteen. While in the light of your position explained over, it truly is concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be deemed for no fault of his possess and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the size of service or from the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

In the event the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only accomplished If your employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as a result they were properly mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

This is because transfer orders are typically deemed within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there could possibly be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more

With the foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically cause exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. Whilst a writ under Article 199 is offered in specific limited situations, it is actually generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-examine witnesses and present his/her defense but did not convince the department of his/her innocence.

11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents from the boy or Lady don't approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they will do if they are able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.

Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, including the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, furnishing a important resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.

The legislation of necessity regarded and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called regulation of necessity..

162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. In case the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days with the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided through the decision in the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.

Statutory laws are Individuals created by legislative bodies, for instance Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this kind of legislation strives to condition our society, providing rules and guidelines, it would be unattainable for almost any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there might be one particular or more judgments specified (or reported). Only cases of administrative law the reason for your decision from the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted in an argument.

refers to regulation that will come from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case legislation, also known as “common regulation,” and “case precedent,” offers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And just how they are applied in certain types of case.

Report this page